![]() And though the radical reformers eventually lost control of England’s national church, they didn’t fade away.Ī small group of English Protestants remained convinced that liturgical prayer was wrongheaded. These debates were not minor events in cloistered hallways, affecting only a few they led to civil war. Liturgy, the reformers said, was repetitive, dull and an invitation to “perform hypocritically,” in historian Lori Branch’s phrase, making it all too easy for churchgoers to speak words that didn’t reflect the true emotions of their hearts. 20, 2020, at the Chase Center in Wilmington, Delaware. Ceremonies and rituals were compromised, they argued - bound up with Catholic superstition as much as with Christian doctrine.ĭemocratic presidential candidate former Vice President Joe Biden speaks during the fourth day of the Democratic National Convention, Aug. Reformers rejected rituals and liturgical prayer as harmful to the spiritual lives of Christians because they believed such acts encouraged inauthenticity. But in the 16th century, reformers sought to purify the Church of England of all this pomp and circumstance, performance and liturgy. The pageantry and ceremony of church celebrations and the liturgical calendar were the seasons of life for Christians. The idea that spontaneous, emotional reaction is more authentic than what is rehearsed sits at the heart of the evangelical spiritual tradition it dates back to the theological conflicts of the 1600s.įor hundreds of years prior, Christians had practiced their faith through ritual and liturgy. The Republican Party wants to claim that Trump is the authenticity candidate - the one who will tell it like it is regardless of what people want to hear - because of the appeal that has to evangelicals. It implies that he’s not speaking from the heart. It’s an odd critique to choose, especially when your candidate regularly flubs his teleprompter lines (revealing, for instance, that he thinks Thailand is pronounced thigh-land).īut this criticism is effective because, to its intended audience - particularly evangelical Christians - it paints Biden as rehearsed, academic and, most of all, inauthentic. This tweet did not go well with the rest of the media.(RNS) - After the Democratic convention last week, the party line from Trump’s people was: Sure, anyone can read a teleprompter. Even a prominent member of the press fell for Trump's humdrum words of war. ![]() The sycophants at Fox News were not the only ones who lauded the speech. That's probably the most important thing," he said.Īnd Newt Gingrich, a devout Trump loyalist, said it "was one of the most honest national security speeches of my lifetime.” "I think this is a dramatic change from the Obama administration. ambassador, told Hannity Monday night: "I think much of what the president said is exactly right."īolton somehow determined that Trump's plan will bring about significant changes from the previous administration. “The speech was also delivered perfectly, the right tone, the right cadence, the right pitch,” he said on his show Monday. Sean Hannity, for his part, said the speech was perfect. "What he decided was that leaving was worse than staying, so we're going to stay, and he says we're going to win," she said.įox News military analyst Jack Keane said he was "impressed" following the speech "because we finally got a commander-in-chief who speaks honestly.” That was enough to please pundits on Fox News.įox News commentator Dana Perino, for example, called Trump's prepared remarks a "great speech." The president stuck to his teleprompter and used words that signaled America's military might. President Trump gave a vague, incoherent speech Monday on his new military strategy for the war in Afghanistan.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |